Supreme Court of Pakistan on Monday heard the Punjab government’s appeal against the acquittal of Sanam Javed in the May 9 riots case. During the proceedings, the court remarked that if injustice is being done, the High Court cannot simply turn a blind eye.
The Punjab government’s counsel argued that Sanam Javed had filed a petition against her remand in the Lahore High Court, which allegedly exceeded its authority by acquitting her from the case altogether.
Justice Hashim Kakar noted that the court had already issued instructions in such cases to be decided within four months, questioning why the trial was still ongoing. He emphasized that the High Court can act even if it receives a letter indicating injustice. “Courts cannot remain silent in the face of injustice,” he said.
Justice Salahuddin added that the High Court holds suo motu powers in criminal revision cases. Meanwhile, Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim questioned the Punjab government’s timing, asking, “Did you just remember after a year that the accused committed a crime?”
In a sarcastic tone, a judge remarked that at this rate, anyone—including himself—could be named in the May 9 cases. The court subsequently adjourned the hearing for an indefinite period.
In a related case, the Punjab government sought time to present evidence in its appeal against the acquittal of Sheikh Rashid in the GHQ attack case. Justice Hashim Kakar expressed strong displeasure, warning that such delays would not be tolerated.
“If you want adjournments, don’t come to this court,” he said sternly. He added that adjournments are only granted in cases of death—either of the judge, lawyer, or accused.
When the special prosecutor requested permission to present confessional statements, Justice Kakar responded harshly, “Fear God—Sheikh Rashid has been elected MNA 50 times. Where would he run off to?”
The court made it clear that political arguments would not be entertained without fulfilling legal requirements and directed that the case be scheduled for hearing next week.
