US Democratic lawmakers have voiced sharp criticism over former President Donald Trump’s anticipated peace deal with Iran, expressing doubt over its effectiveness and long-term impact.
The proposed agreement has sparked political debate in Washington, with critics calling it weak and questioning its strategic value.
California Senator Adam Schiff reacted cautiously to Trump’s announcement, saying he hopes the former president’s claim that “the war is over” proves to be accurate.
However, Schiff expressed skepticism based on past experiences, stating that similar claims have been made before alongside what he described as “broken promises.”
He also criticised Trump’s broader foreign policy record, arguing that it has led to increased tensions rather than stability.
Seth Moulton calls deal a 'surrender document
Massachusetts Congressman Seth Moulton was more direct in his criticism, describing the proposed agreement as a “surrender document.”
Speaking to MS Now, Moulton said the deal appears heavily one-sided and questioned whether it represents a genuine victory for the United States.
He also raised concerns about the cost of the conflict, claiming that billions in taxpayer money had already been spent and that American lives had been lost during the ongoing tensions.
According to him, the agreement merely reopens strategic access routes that were already functional before the escalation.
Political divide deepens in Washington
The remarks reflect a growing divide in US politics over Trump’s foreign policy approach and his handling of Iran-related tensions.
While supporters argue that the deal could bring stability, critics warn it may amount to concessions that weaken the US negotiating position.
The debate highlights ongoing disagreements in Washington over how to balance diplomacy, military pressure, and long-term regional strategy.
